harshs Deputation vs. Absorption in Government Services
1. Key Differences
- Deputation: Temporary transfer to another dept/organization; lien and seniority remain with parent cadre.
- Absorption: Permanent appointment in borrowing dept; lien shifts, employee becomes part of new cadre.
2. Effect on Career Progression & Service Conditions
- Deputation: Promotions and seniority continue in parent cadre; pay protection ensured; exposure + mobility but tenure-limited.
- Absorption: Career growth and promotions as per new dept rules; seniority often reset; stable service conditions and long-term cadre security.
3. Inter-Departmental Mobility
- Deputation: Easier; short-term flexibility to work across depts.
- Absorption: Mobility restricted after permanent transfer.
4. Administrative Challenges
- Delays in NOC and cadre clearance.
- Seniority and pay fixation disputes.
- Parent dept reluctance (loss of manpower).
- Litigation if DoPT/recruitment rules not followed.
5. Conversion of Deputation into Absorption
- Permissible if:
- Recruitment rules allow absorption.
- Parent dept issues NOC.
- Employee consents.
- Governed by DoPT OMs, service recruitment rules, and court judgments (e.g., SC on cadre transfer).
6. Favorability for Long-Term Growth
- Deputation: Best for short-term learning, inter-departmental exposure, networking.
- Absorption: More favorable for long-term career progression, promotions, and service security.
In summary: Deputation = temporary, mobility-driven with parent cadre growth; Absorption = permanent, stable with long-term growth. Conversion needs NOC + rule compliance + DoPT guidelines.