Y
YashGupta

  • Jul 14, 2023
  • Joined Apr 7, 2022
  • The recent Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) recruitment tests held in Srinagar have experienced a significant decline in candidate attendance, with only 43% of the expected number of candidates appearing for the exams. The low turnout has raised concerns about the reasons behind this decrease and the implications for the recruitment process.

    The recruitment tests were conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) and included two separate examinations: the Recruitment Test for Accounts Officer/Enforcement Officer (AO/EO) held in the forenoon and the Recruitment Test for Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (APFC) held in the afternoon. These exams took place across 17 different centers in Srinagar.

    To ensure the smooth conduct of the examinations, the UPSC appointed the office of the Divisional Commissioner Kashmir as the coordinating and supervising authority. The Divisional Commissioner Kashmir, in turn, appointed 17 inspecting officers for the various centers and the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar, nominated mobile magistrates for each venue. A meeting was held by the Divisional Commissioner Kashmir, which included principals, venue coordinators, inspecting officers, and representatives from the police, security, and traffic departments to discuss the necessary arrangements for the exams.

    Despite these preparations, the total number of candidates expected to attend the exams was 5835 for the posts of Accounts Officer and Enforcement Officer, while 6326 candidates had registered for the posts of Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner. However, the actual attendance fell significantly short of these numbers, with only 2634 candidates appearing for the AO/EO exams and 2732 candidates attending the APFC exams. This low attendance rate resulted in an overall present percentage of 43% for both recruitment tests.

    While the examinations concluded smoothly without any untoward incidents, the reasons behind the low attendance are multi-faceted. One major factor is the prevailing security situation in the region, which often leads to unrest and disruptions in the Kashmir Valley. Candidates faced challenges in traveling to the exam centers due to the uncertain environment and the fear of potential incidents. Limited availability of public transport also posed difficulties, particularly for candidates residing in remote areas or outside the city limits.

    The low attendance recorded in Srinagar is a cause for concern, as it not only limits opportunities for local candidates but also hampers the overall objective of achieving a diverse and inclusive workforce within the EPFO. The recruitment process should provide equal opportunities for candidates from all regions to ensure a fair and transparent selection process.

    It is crucial to recognize that the low attendance in the recruitment tests is a symptom of the larger issues faced by the region. Addressing the underlying causes of the unrest, improving infrastructure, and promoting a conducive environment for candidates to participate in such exams are essential steps toward fostering a more inclusive and equitable recruitment process.

  • 8132877498
    No, the age limit is 18 to 25 years.

    Relaxation only for Government servants up to the age of 40 years in case of general candidates and up to 45 years in case of candidates belonging to SC/ST in accordance with the instruction or orders issued by the Central Government from time to time.

  • NCERT and SCERT are two educational organizations in India. Here is the difference between the two:

    Coverage: NCERT is a national level organization responsible for research and development in the field of education, while SCERT is a state-level organization responsible for the same within a particular state.

    Curriculum: NCERT develops and promotes a common curriculum framework for all schools in the country, while SCERT develops the curriculum and syllabus for the state board schools.

    Education Material: NCERT develops and publishes textbooks and educational material for all levels of education, while SCERT also develops textbooks and educational material, but primarily for the state board schools.

    Focus: NCERT has a national focus and aims to promote a uniform education system throughout the country. On the other hand, SCERT has a state-specific focus and aims to cater to the unique educational needs of a particular state.

    Affiliation: NCERT is not affiliated with any particular board or institution, while SCERT is affiliated with the State Board of Education in their respective states.

    In summary, NCERT is a national level organization responsible for the development and promotion of education throughout the country, while SCERT is a state-level organization that focuses on the educational needs of a particular state.

  • PriyanjaliSingh
    As of now, the Common Eligibility Test (CET) by the National Recruitment Agency (NRA) has not started yet. The NRA is currently in the process of setting up the necessary infrastructure and finalizing the details for conducting the CET.

    The creation of the NRA and the implementation of the CET were announced by the Government of India in August and September 2020, respectively.

    The NRA has not yet announced the exact date for the commencement of the CET. However, it is expected that the CET will be conducted in the near future.

  • As of now, there is no significant update on the National Recruitment Agency (NRA) and the Common Eligibility Test (CET). However, it is worth noting that the implementation of the CET has been welcomed by several stakeholders, including job aspirants, recruitment agencies, and government bodies. The introduction of the CET is expected to bring about significant changes in the recruitment process for government jobs, and it is likely to have a positive impact on the overall efficiency and transparency of the recruitment process.

    It is also important to note that the establishment of the NRA is part of the government’s larger plan to streamline the recruitment process for government jobs in India. The government has been working on several other initiatives, such as digitization of recruitment processes, use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the recruitment process, and standardization of selection criteria, among others. These initiatives are aimed at making the recruitment process more efficient, transparent, and accessible to all job aspirants.

    • The National Recruitment Agency (NRA) was recently established by the Indian government with the aim of providing a common platform for conducting preliminary exams for recruitment to various government jobs. This is a significant step towards simplifying and streamlining the recruitment process for job aspirants across the country. The Union Cabinet of India approved the creation of the NRA on August 19, 2020.
      In this article, we will discuss the implications of the NRA for job aspirants.

      Firstly, the establishment of the NRA will significantly reduce the burden on job aspirants who have to appear for multiple exams for different government jobs. The NRA will conduct a Common Eligibility Test (CET) for various Group B and C non-technical posts, which will serve as the first stage of the recruitment process. The CET will be conducted in multiple languages and will be valid for a period of three years, thereby providing more opportunities for job aspirants to apply for various government jobs.

      Secondly, the NRA will also help in reducing the cost of the recruitment process for job aspirants. Currently, job aspirants have to spend a significant amount of money on travel, accommodation, and other expenses while appearing for multiple exams. With the introduction of the CET, job aspirants will be able to appear for a single exam, thereby reducing their overall expenses.

      Thirdly, the establishment of the NRA will also help in reducing the time taken for the recruitment process. With the current recruitment process, it can take several months or even years for a candidate to get selected for a government job. With the introduction of the CET, the first stage of the recruitment process can be completed within a few weeks, thereby speeding up the entire process.

      However, there are also some concerns regarding the implementation of the NRA. One of the main concerns is the potential for a reduction in the quality of recruitment due to the standardization of the exam. With the introduction of the CET, the same exam will be conducted for various government jobs, which may not be suitable for all jobs. This may lead to a situation where candidates who are not suitable for a particular job are selected based on their performance in the CET.

      Another concern is the potential for the NRA to become a monopoly in the recruitment process. With the NRA being the only agency conducting the CET, there is a risk of it becoming a monopoly in the recruitment process, which may not be beneficial for job aspirants in the long run.

      In conclusion, the establishment of the NRA is a significant step towards simplifying and streamlining the recruitment process for job aspirants in India. It has the potential to reduce the burden, cost, and time taken for the recruitment process. However, it is important for the government to address the concerns regarding the quality of recruitment and the potential for a monopoly in the recruitment process. The success of the NRA will depend on its ability to provide a fair, transparent, and efficient recruitment process for job aspirants across the country.

      Official Source - “Landmark day for India’s youth”

    • One of the key benefits of AI-based proctoring is the ability to monitor exams remotely. This can be especially useful during the current pandemic, where in-person exams may not be possible or safe. With AI-based proctoring, exams can be conducted online, allowing candidates to take the exam from the comfort of their homes.

      AI-based proctoring can also help prevent cheating in exams. With traditional proctoring, it can be difficult to detect cheating in real-time. Candidates may use various methods to cheat, such as hidden notes, mobile phones, or whispering to others. AI-based proctoring can detect these anomalies in real-time and flag them for review, preventing cheating and ensuring the integrity of the exam.

      However, there are also some challenges associated with AI-based proctoring. One of the biggest challenges is the potential for false positives and false negatives. False positives occur when innocent candidates are flagged as cheaters, while false negatives occur when cheating is not detected. Both of these scenarios can lead to unfair outcomes and damage the credibility of the exam.

      Another challenge is the potential for bias in AI-based proctoring. AI-based systems are only as unbiased as the data they are trained on. If the training data is biased, the system may replicate that bias in its decision-making. For example, if the system is trained on data that has a racial or gender bias, it may unfairly flag candidates from certain demographics as cheaters.

      Privacy is another major concern with AI-based proctoring. The systems collect a large amount of personal data, including biometric data such as facial images and voice recordings. This data can be sensitive and can be misused if it falls into the wrong hands. It is important for government agencies to ensure that the data is collected, stored, and used in a secure and responsible manner.

      In conclusion, AI-based proctoring has the potential to revolutionize government recruitment exams by improving efficiency, accuracy, and objectivity. However, it is important for government agencies to carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of AI-based proctoring and implement it in a transparent and accountable manner. This will ensure that the system is fair, unbiased, and respects the privacy of candidates.

    • Students Demand - Extend eligibility criteria

      Why Students are demanding to extend the MBBS Internship cut-off?

      Many of the interns will not be eligible for NEET PG 2023 because of the internship completion cutt off on the 31.March.2023, due to the COVID pandemic and delay in result publications. As per the NEET PG 2023 eligibility criteria, those students who have completed the one-year internship or are likely to complete it on or before 31st March 2023 may apply for NEET PG 2023.
      Indian Medical Association (IMA), candidates, and The Federal of Resident Doctors Association (FORDA) request to extend the eligibility date to June 20, 2023. FORDA also gives the fact that more than 50% of medical interns are eligible to give the exam due to the delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

      FORDA tweets for the extension of NEET PG 2023 eligibility criteria-

      Issue considered by NMC

      After dectors wrote the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare appealing for the extension of the cutt off date, the NMC is considering the matter actively.

    • Two-day Window

      Today I read newspaper where there is a news regarding two day window where DU Registrar Vikas Gupta said a two day window will be provided to the candidates to reorder their programme and College preferences.

      So according to the news we will get the chance to change the preference but I think it will be best if you select best for you Initially. As there will be a lot’s of students who were using the site that time, What if there will be server issue?

      PoojaSingh

    • The CSAS portal will automatically draw students’ scores in the Common University Entrance Test (CUET) and assign colleges and programs on the basis of the candidate’s normalized scores and preferences.

      PoojaSingh

    • University Grants Commission share Public Notice of Fake Universities.
      Fake universities existed in States like Delhi , Karnataka, Kerala , Maharashtra etc.
      I m sharing the list of universities here -

    • SSC Cgl ki vacancies to devide hongi CGL 22 - 23 mae?

    • Vishal Jolly Demanded for granting 3 years age relaxation for all aspiring candidates participating in the ongoing recruitment process of Andaman and Nicobar Islands and all other forthcoming recruitment under A&N Administration, considering the pandemic.

    • Some candidates of CGLE-2021 (Tier-II) Examination have been shifted from one center to another center due to unavoidable reasons. Check the Official notice on EPF Alert

      Let’s see either my center shifted or not

    • Union Minister Dr Jitendra Singh informs that Government has increased annual intake of IAS officers to 180 through Civil Services Examination (CSE) since CSE-2012 and that of IPS to 200 from CSE-2020

      As on 01.01.2022, there are 1472 vacancies in IAS and 864 vacancies in IPS in various States

      Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) Science & Technology; Minister of State (Independent Charge) Earth Sciences; MoS PMO, Personnel, Public Grievances, Pensions, Atomic Energy and Space, Dr Jitendra Singh today informed that Government has increased the annual intake of IAS officers to 180 through Civil Services Examination (CSE) since CSE-2012. Similarly, intake of IPS officers through CSE has been increased to 200 from CSE-2020.

      Replying to a question in the Rajya Sabha, Dr Jitendra Singh said, optimal intake of directly recruited (DR) IAS officers increased on the basis of the recommendations of Baswan Committee. The Committee had also recommended that any number above 180 would a) compromise quality; b) exceed the LBSNAA’s capacity and; c) lead to distortion in the career pyramid of IAS officers, particularly for senior posts in the Government of India.

      Dr Jitendra Singh said, as on 01.01.2022, there are 1472 vacancies in IAS and 864 vacancies in IPS in various States. He added that occurrence and filing up of vacancies is a continuous process. It is the endeavour of the Central Government to fill up the vacancies in the cadres. The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) conducts Civil Services Examination (CSE) for filing up of vacancies on direct recruitment basis in the category of IAS & IPS every year.

      The Minister also informed that to fill up vacancies in Promotion Quota, Selection Committee Meetings are held by Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) with the State Governments.

    • SSC Recruitment Scam raises to 50 Crore. I think Partha Chatterjee should give resignation.